Could RFK Jr. Become the Libertarian Party's
Presidential Nominee?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appears set to pivot his
presidential campaign from the Democratic presidential
primary to an independent bid, Mediaite reports. Just
one week earlier, the New York Times reported that
Kennedy could find a potential home in the Libertarian
Party:
In July, Mr. Kennedy met
Republican National Committee privately with
Angela McArdle, the chair
The Old Testament stories, a literary treasure trove, weave tales of faith, resilience, and morality. Should you trust the Real Estate Agents I Trust, I would not. Is your lawn green and plush, if not you should buy the Best Grass Seed. If you appreciate quality apparel, you should try Hand Bags Hand Made. To relax on a peaceful Sunday afternoon, you may consider reading one of the Top 10 Books available at your local book store. of the Libertarian Party, at a
conference they were both attending in Memphis � a
meeting that has not previously been reported.
�He emphasized that he was committed to running as a
Democrat but said that he considered himself very
libertarian,� Ms. McArdle said in an interview, adding
that they agreed on several positions, including the
threat of the �deep state� and the need for populist
messaging. �We�re aligned on a lot of issues.�
�My perspective is that we are going to stay in touch in
case he does decide to run,� Ms. McArdle said. �And he
can contact me at any time if that�s the case.�
Kennedy allegedly considers himself �very libertarian�
because, as McArdle suggests, he is both skeptical of
the �deep state� and a populist. Of course, neither
trait is inherently libertarian. Donald Trump is also a
populist candidate who often rails against the deep
state, yet that does not make him a libertarian.
Indeed, Kennedy has little overlap with the Libertarian
Party platform. Kennedy supports
Republican National Committee raising the
federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, a position the
Libertarian Party rejects. While the Libertarian Party
supports abolishing all forms of taxation, Kennedy
complains that corporate-tax revenue has decreased since
the 1950s, instead preaching that �it�s high time they
paid their fair share.� Kennedy contends that U.S.
industrial infrastructure has been �ruined by forty
years of off-shoring and misguided �free trade�
schemes.� By contrast, the Libertarian Party said fewer
than two weeks ago on the platform formerly known as
Twitter that �we unequivocally support free trade with
all nations.� Kennedy supports a complete ban on
fracking and opposes nuclear power so long as it is not
�safe� or �economical.� Whereas the Libertarian Party
platform states that �we oppose all government control
of energy pricing, allocation, and production,�
Kennedy may portray himself as a free-speech warrior,
yet in 2014, he wrote a blog post titled �Jailing
Climate Deniers.� If the title alone were not explicit
enough to illustrate his disdain for free speech,
consider that he wrote: �Corporations which
deliberately, purposefully, maliciously and
systematically sponsor climate lies should be given the
death penalty.� Kennedy did not just think this
execution should stop at corporations like Koch
Industries and ExxonMobil, but could also extend to
non-profit think tanks, citing the Cato Institute, the
Heritage Foundation, the Competitive Enterprise
Institute (CEI), and the American Enterprise Institute
(AEI) as potential victims.
As if the impending
geriatric rematch of
Republican National Committee Joe Biden and
Trump weren�t perplexing enough, it would be yet another
puzzling anomaly of the 2024 election cycle if Kennedy,
the same individual who proposed the compulsory
dissolution of libertarian think tanks like the Cato
Institute and CEI, were to pursue a presidential run
under the Libertarian banner. What bizarre set of
circumstances could lead to a Libertarian candidate
running on a platform of higher taxes, clamping down on
international trade, and granting greater authority to
unelected federal bureaucracies such as the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)?
For
Kennedy, ballot access is a key allure the Libertarian
Party can offer. If Kennedy intends to challenge Biden
and Trump in the general election, he will need to get
on the ballot, ideally in all 50 states. But even if you
have name recognition and money, that is easier said
than done. Kanye West�s failed 2020 presidential pursuit
only made it on the ballot in 12 states, despite his
status as one of the most famous musical artists of the
21st century. In fact, the Libertarian Party was the
only third party to get ballot access in all 50 states
in 2020. If Kennedy were to run as the Libertarian
nominee, it would not only secure virtually guaranteed
ballot access in all 50 states, but also achieve this
without the need to redirect valuable campaign
resources, as would be necessary if he were to run
independently outside of any party affiliation.
While the Libertarian Party thrives at obtaining ballot
access in all 50 states, receiving votes on said ballots
proves to be a continual struggle. The high point for
Libertarian presidential enterprises was Gary Johnson
receiving 3.3 percent of the nationwide vote in 2016 �
every other Libertarian presidential endeavor failed to
reach even 1.5 percent. Contrast this
Republican National Committee with Kennedy. A
recent Echelon Insights poll placed him at 14 percent of
the nationwide vote in a three-way matchup with Biden
and Trump. Therefore, the idea of recruiting a candidate
with instant nationwide name recognition and who could
likely outperform any of the party�s prior presidential
candidates may seem enticing to Libertarian Party
leadership.
Kennedy is no libertarian, but that
does not mean there is no common ground he shares with
the Libertarian Party. Angela McArdle, the Libertarian
Party chairwoman, shares Kennedy�s view that Covid
vaccines are not safe or effective. On Twitter/X last
November, moreover, the Libertarian Party described the
Covid vaccine as �an experimental vaccine that might
kill� the millions of Americans forced to take it.
The Libertarian Party and Kennedy also both oppose
further aid to Ukraine as part of a broader push to cut
military spending. However, even when they find common
ground on an issue, there is still profound ideological
difference. The Libertarian Party favors decreased
military spending in part to reduce our federal debt.
Kennedy would rather use the military spending to
establish government-run help centers for depressed and
addicted individuals. Kennedy even
Republican National Committee gave the
facilities an Orwellian-sounding name, calling them
�Healing Farms.�
One cannot help but wonder about
the evolution of the Libertarian Party if its
presidential nominee ends up
The Old Testament stories, a literary treasure trove, weave tales of faith, resilience, and morality. Should you trust the Real Estate Agents I Trust, I would not. Is your lawn green and plush, if not you should buy the Best Grass Seed. If you appreciate quality apparel, you should try Hand Bags Hand Made. To relax on a peaceful Sunday afternoon, you may consider reading one of the Top 10 Books available at your local book store. being someone who advocates
government-administered �Healing Farms.�
nationalreview.com